Arikado
New Blood
I, too, have things I must do within these castle walls.
Posts: 80
inherit
995
0
Dec 11, 2019 9:55:47 GMT -6
65
Arikado
I, too, have things I must do within these castle walls.
80
Dec 30, 2015 2:16:15 GMT -6
December 2015
arikado
|
Post by Arikado on May 26, 2019 0:52:06 GMT -6
Something I don't believe I've mentioned here yet - the favorite of my suggestions to 505 about this since the news broke is to add the OST to physical $60 tiers. It's not perfect and wouldn't please everybody, but I think it would be nice and even out the value more for sure. I brainstormed several thoughts like this before I saw the backer reaction because I knew it would be an issue. Something gunlord thought too was a pdf of the artbook added to digital 60 if necessary to similarly bump it up, if the above was done or even if not. I stand by that the value is "okay", but okay is not acceptable in the minds of many who put up for this thing 4 years ago (and of course, when comparing to $28, 40, etc). It should instead be good, if not great, for them and I can't disagree with that. I appreciate the sentiment, but as a digital backer, I don't think a pdf of the artbook would solve the issue, because just like the OST and the digital strategy booklet, it will all be available on the internet for free. And it's not connected to the game, so $28 backers and non-backers can get it all without feeling like thieves, because they already bought the game (I would do the same if I was in their shoes). Honestly, if I knew that $28 backers and even non-backers would get a better deal than $60 backers, I wouldn't have backed at $60. Oh well.
|
|
Arikado
New Blood
I, too, have things I must do within these castle walls.
Posts: 80
inherit
995
0
Dec 11, 2019 9:55:47 GMT -6
65
Arikado
I, too, have things I must do within these castle walls.
80
Dec 30, 2015 2:16:15 GMT -6
December 2015
arikado
|
Post by Arikado on May 26, 2019 0:59:38 GMT -6
That's fine. Bold: Again, those things will be available for everyone on the internet day 1, for free, so it's not like we're getting anything of note for backing at $60, other than the extra content that $28 backers can get for $10. I mean, if you want to go that far, the game itself can be had on the internet with some unknown amount of effort (likely not a lot, since this is a GOG release). That doesn't mean it lacks value, if someone can just decide they want to take it instead of paying for it. Beyond that, the music quality from Youtube would certainly not be comparable. I addressed that in my last reply. Pirating the game is not the same as having the other extra things readily available, like the OST. The two are not connected, so people can buy the game and get the extra stuff for free, due to their availability. And I think you're a little exaggerating by saying the OST on Youtube wouldn't be comparable to the digital OST. Most people wouldn't notice a difference, honestly.
|
|
purifyweirdshard
Administrator
Administrator
Calling from Heaven
Posts: 3,789
Staff Mini-Profile Theme: Example 2
inherit
Administrator
210
0
1
Oct 25, 2024 0:03:05 GMT -6
3,660
purifyweirdshard
Calling from Heaven
3,789
Jun 29, 2015 7:24:38 GMT -6
June 2015
purifyweirdsoul
Staff Mini-Profile Theme: Example 2
|
Post by purifyweirdshard on May 26, 2019 1:22:23 GMT -6
I mean, if you want to go that far, the game itself can be had on the internet with some unknown amount of effort (likely not a lot, since this is a GOG release). That doesn't mean it lacks value, if someone can just decide they want to take it instead of paying for it. Beyond that, the music quality from Youtube would certainly not be comparable. I addressed that in my last reply. Pirating the game is not the same as having the other extra things readily available, like the OST. The two are not connected, so people can buy the game and get the extra stuff for free, due to their availability. And I think you're a little exaggerating by saying the OST on Youtube wouldn't be comparable to the digital OST. Most people wouldn't notice a difference, honestly. Ehh. Agree to disagree there. If that were true about music, the digital music business wouldn't exist, let alone thriving as it appears to be doing.
|
|
Arikado
New Blood
I, too, have things I must do within these castle walls.
Posts: 80
inherit
995
0
Dec 11, 2019 9:55:47 GMT -6
65
Arikado
I, too, have things I must do within these castle walls.
80
Dec 30, 2015 2:16:15 GMT -6
December 2015
arikado
|
Post by Arikado on May 26, 2019 1:57:43 GMT -6
I addressed that in my last reply. Pirating the game is not the same as having the other extra things readily available, like the OST. The two are not connected, so people can buy the game and get the extra stuff for free, due to their availability. And I think you're a little exaggerating by saying the OST on Youtube wouldn't be comparable to the digital OST. Most people wouldn't notice a difference, honestly. Ehh. Agree to disagree there. If that were true about music, the digital music business wouldn't exist, let alone thriving as it appears to be doing. Let's be honest, quality is not the reason people buy music, most people do it to support their favorite artists/composers, and because services like iTunes/Spotify provide easy to manage playlists. Quality is just an extra feature, and it's hardly noticeable to most people. I have downloaded high quality soundtracks from Youtube, and I listen to many of them on my phone. Never had quality issues. I'm not sure if the digital OST will be lossless, but if it is that's good. Still not something I would pay extra for, though. If I own the game, I have the right to listen to and download its soundtracks from the internet.
|
|
inherit
1881
0
Oct 29, 2019 17:44:00 GMT -6
449
freddythemonkey
489
May 23, 2017 4:59:35 GMT -6
May 2017
freddythemonkey
|
Post by freddythemonkey on May 26, 2019 2:19:10 GMT -6
If I own the game, I have the right to listen to and download its soundtracks from the internet. Actually no. It is not legal to download a copyrighted work off Youtube. You can listen to licensed music on YT all you want, but you can't download it. (Well actually you can and nobody will sue you for it, but that's another can of worms. In theory, you're not supposed to do that.) Digital OSTs for video games are generally so cheap too. Services like Bandcamp also provides you with the download of any format you like (and trust me, the difference in quality IS noticeable), so when I really like an OST, I buy it on Bandcamp. Yeah, some bigger devs don't have a Bandcamp page or even a Spotify page to listen to the tunes but most indie composers do have them.
|
|
Arikado
New Blood
I, too, have things I must do within these castle walls.
Posts: 80
inherit
995
0
Dec 11, 2019 9:55:47 GMT -6
65
Arikado
I, too, have things I must do within these castle walls.
80
Dec 30, 2015 2:16:15 GMT -6
December 2015
arikado
|
Post by Arikado on May 26, 2019 3:19:06 GMT -6
If I own the game, I have the right to listen to and download its soundtracks from the internet. Actually no. It is not legal to download a copyrighted work off Youtube. You can listen to licensed music on YT all you want, but you can't download it. (Well actually you can and nobody will sue you for it, but that's another can of worms. In theory, you're not supposed to do that.) Digital OSTs for video games are generally so cheap too. Services like Bandcamp also provides you with the download of any format you like (and trust me, the difference in quality IS noticeable), so when I really like an OST, I buy it on Bandcamp. Yeah, some bigger devs don't have a Bandcamp page or even a Spotify page to listen to the tunes but most indie composers do have them. Well, we're not supposed to lie, yet everyone does it. It's simply my belief that if I own a game, I should have the right to listen to its soundtracks, and what's the difference between listening and downloading the soundtrack? You download it to listen to it, so there's no difference in my book. I can start the game that I own and listen to its soundtracks anytime I want, but having the soundtrack on my phone is simply more convenient, nothing more and nothing less. As for quality, I have downloaded lossless soundtracks and I honestly never noticed any difference in quality that's worth mentioning. It's just not something that many people notice or care about.
|
|
Yän
Herald of the Moon
Loyal Familiar
Posts: 476
inherit
Herald of the Moon
1316
0
Jan 2, 2022 8:01:36 GMT -6
415
Yän
476
Jun 12, 2016 6:59:44 GMT -6
June 2016
yaen
|
Post by Yän on May 26, 2019 4:47:18 GMT -6
Arikado Rights are not opinion mate. If you download the OST from Youtube or the PDF from some other place without having paid for it, that's just as much piracy as downloading the full game is.
|
|
inherit
396
0
Oct 11, 2023 0:44:48 GMT -6
106
saberwolf94
247
Jul 15, 2015 0:15:32 GMT -6
July 2015
saberwolf94
|
Post by saberwolf94 on May 26, 2019 7:38:25 GMT -6
I came here to voice my disappointment with the false advertising/dishonesty. That doesn't even have anything to do with any opinions. You can love the company and accept dishonest and sleazy practices all you want. I'm at least smart enough to know it's fruitless to try and stop anyone that is so biased from doing that. But that's not going to change the fact that they false advertised, and I haven't seen any real "engagement to the contrary". All I've seen are insults and/or disingenuous strawman arguments such as "you didn't lose any content". Eventually the posts in this particular thread progressed to you accusing me of saying you didn't read the thread (which I obviously wouldn't know, doesn't even matter, and didn't even have anything to do with what I was conveying) and trying to paint me as being "inappropriate". It's bizarre, even for an official video game forum. Warning: Upcoming wall of text. About the “false advertising” argument, the Kickstarter rage and other stuff.Playing the "false advertising card" it's unfair because of the unpredictable and mutable nature of the Kickstarter projects, the Bloodstained: RotN project isn't the exception to the rule, and sorry for being too obvious but before crowfunding a project, you must be aware of all the risks, challenges, changes and inconveniences that can be presented. Knowing all of this, you will save yourself a lot of misunderstandings, problems, and headaches in the future. Tell me in which part, row or paragraph in the Kickstarter terms of use document says: if you don't meet ALL the BACKER TIERS, MILESTONES, PROMISES, or if you CHANGE something in your Kickstarter project, you, your company and all your employees will burn in hell for the rest of the eternity because of violation of the terms and conditions of the Satan Kickstarter contract. Also, Kickstarter isn't a purchase, a pre-order, an inversion, or a rent: it's a gamble (or a donation if you prefer); basically you're gambling your hard-earned money to an idea that you want to become into fruition, and sometimes, there are unexpected turns and bumps on the road. Fortunately, most of the Bloodstained: RotN changes have being pretty good IMO, and the best of all is we will get an even better game than before. Kickstarter is an ideas casino and sometimes you get the thing you really want, but sometimes you get an awful or a half-backed product, or even worst; you don't get anything (perhaps a crappy demo, or a shirt if you are lucky.), so be aware of all that. With Bloodstained: RotN you will get a full game, and with lots of extra content in the not-so-distant future. You're basically saying what almost everyone has said that wants to defend 505 like they're your brother or something. I've heard this numerous times already. You are absolutely correct that by the loose and easy going nature of no consequences on kickstarter they can change their mind, it's a donation not an exact pre-order like you've said in essence and they have chosen to go that route. I have accepted that reality and learnt my lesson. It might be a small price to pay for them I know, but if they do make a future kickstarter again there is no incentive for me to back it, it's in my best interest to buy whatever I choose after it's available. I will also state my experience, my thoughts on this whole thing and anyone that never backed a project can weigh themselves the ups and downs and if the want to be treated like I and other backers were. That's all I can do at the end of the day, tell my experience like it is to any future backer of anything and it's up to them at that point. 505 brought this on themselves and it's a small price to pay if you ask me. I want to let the matter rest but you "defenders" really don't like the fact that if you're not unhappy then we shouldn't be either. You don't want any negative connotation, you want to convince people like me that what they've done is no problem but you cannot deny the facts. You don't have to tell that "backing is a gamble" like I didn't know what I was getting into. I'm a man that takes someone on their word. They did what they have to do to increase the chances of the game being hit, good on them and I'll do what I have to do that's good for me. You can't have it both ways. This isn't the only issue, and in fact it's a small one compared to what more overseas backers like me will have to deal with. With the shipment changing from 1 to at least 3 it makes things complicated with import fees and custom charges and I have no clue how this is going to be handled by 505 or fangamer. You could say that's another promise that was broken, they could have waited one or two months more if they weren't ready, hardly makes a difference at this point but the agenda to make the game a hit naturally will have to take priority. I hope they prove me wrong because I don't want to lose money for nothing I've already paid $365 but so far I haven't received any answer from fangamer or 505.
|
|
inherit
295
0
Oct 22, 2019 22:28:27 GMT -6
147
Overlord
161
Jul 11, 2015 8:58:41 GMT -6
July 2015
overlord
|
Post by Overlord on May 26, 2019 9:23:25 GMT -6
I came here to voice my disappointment with the false advertising/dishonesty. That doesn't even have anything to do with any opinions. You can love the company and accept dishonest and sleazy practices all you want. I'm at least smart enough to know it's fruitless to try and stop anyone that is so biased from doing that. But that's not going to change the fact that they false advertised, and I haven't seen any real "engagement to the contrary". All I've seen are insults and/or disingenuous strawman arguments such as "you didn't lose any content". Eventually the posts in this particular thread progressed to you accusing me of saying you didn't read the thread (which I obviously wouldn't know, doesn't even matter, and didn't even have anything to do with what I was conveying) and trying to paint me as being "inappropriate". It's bizarre, even for an official video game forum. You saw what you chose to see, we all do that. I hope you can still enjoy the game. I'm a fan first and I will always want to participate in that capacity because that's what I am. I would step down if I had to in order to keep doing that, but I don't feel that's an option either for me because there's work to do that I'm passionate about - and the last few days has been a lot of work. My apologies. I will also endeavor more to not have a perceived bias. I can say for certain that I didn't choose to see the company's dishonesty. It's there for everyone to see.
|
|
inherit
295
0
Oct 22, 2019 22:28:27 GMT -6
147
Overlord
161
Jul 11, 2015 8:58:41 GMT -6
July 2015
overlord
|
Post by Overlord on May 26, 2019 9:29:17 GMT -6
You don't want any negative connotation, you want to convince people like me that what they've done is no problem but you cannot deny the facts. That's another good way to put it.
|
|
inherit
295
0
Oct 22, 2019 22:28:27 GMT -6
147
Overlord
161
Jul 11, 2015 8:58:41 GMT -6
July 2015
overlord
|
Post by Overlord on May 26, 2019 9:31:19 GMT -6
.
|
|
Arikado
New Blood
I, too, have things I must do within these castle walls.
Posts: 80
inherit
995
0
Dec 11, 2019 9:55:47 GMT -6
65
Arikado
I, too, have things I must do within these castle walls.
80
Dec 30, 2015 2:16:15 GMT -6
December 2015
arikado
|
Post by Arikado on May 26, 2019 10:28:57 GMT -6
Arikado Rights are not opinion mate. If you download the OST from Youtube or the PDF from some other place without having paid for it, that's just as much piracy as downloading the full game is. Where's the logic in this? I own the game and can listen to its soundtracks any time I want, yet I can't listen to it on my phone? I can go on Youtube and listen to the soundtracks (that were ripped from the game that I own), but if I download it I am doing an act of piracy, despite my reason for downloading it is so I can listen to it. "You can listen to it, but you can't listen to it that way" This is such a non-issue, but some people like to create an issue out of nothing.
|
|
purifyweirdshard
Administrator
Administrator
Calling from Heaven
Posts: 3,789
Staff Mini-Profile Theme: Example 2
inherit
Administrator
210
0
1
Oct 25, 2024 0:03:05 GMT -6
3,660
purifyweirdshard
Calling from Heaven
3,789
Jun 29, 2015 7:24:38 GMT -6
June 2015
purifyweirdsoul
Staff Mini-Profile Theme: Example 2
|
Post by purifyweirdshard on May 26, 2019 13:25:59 GMT -6
Arikado Rights are not opinion mate. If you download the OST from Youtube or the PDF from some other place without having paid for it, that's just as much piracy as downloading the full game is. Where's the logic in this? I own the game and can listen to its soundtracks any time I want, yet I can't listen to it on my phone? I can go on Youtube and listen to the soundtracks (that were ripped from the game that I own), but if I download it I am doing an act of piracy, despite my reason for downloading it is so I can listen to it. "You can listen to it, but you can't listen to it that way" This is such a non-issue, but some people like to create an issue out of nothing. It's not his logic, it's just digital law. I can explain the logic though I think by putting this into some physical terms via analogy. Are you familiar with Costco, Sam's Club, BJ's etc? They're large wholesaler stores that consumers can buy memberships to yearly to get nice discounts on bulk business or everyday items with other included benefits. The comparison here is walking into one of those stores and seeing they're offering a sample station of chicken, as they often do of a lot of things they have. This is being served in an approved capacity by you both and understood to be agreed on in your purchase to their entity/service, but then you do either of the following: - You go to the chicken product in its freezer etc, take it to the cashier and explain "I should be able to take this product home for free and enjoy it whenever at my leisure in my home, because I have already paid for the enjoyment of it since you have it to eat freely here"
- (edit: actually, disregard this example - thinking more about it, I don't think applies as well to what I mean/music) You stand in front of the employee serving the chicken for hours at a time and eating until you're full on any occasions you want, which is less illegal but very poor taste (and probably results in your removal too though anyway) for similar justification above
Besides that, part of the logic is the precedent the opposite would set. If it's more logical to never support people who work hard on music for games, less incentive that we ever should and art disappears from our world more than it should. "You should do/deliver x to me and all for free and it becomes all of our property after you do it" as the default stance only encourages...well, it only encourages yourself to take. Something being more convenient/less likely to be caught doesn't make it more legal/good to do, either. Have we/do we all do it sometimes? Probably, but that doesn't make it right either, or what we want for our digital x thing or x person(s) we care about. edit: Oh I forgot to mention another thing I wanted to touch on - I was like you too about appreciating music quality until I upgraded my listening devices. A better pair of headphones (especially headphones in my experience) or speakers makes all the difference. I went from "I can tell a moderate difference in my $10 drug store headphones to these $50 Amazon ones" to "HOLY crap it's night and day with these $200+ ones/speakers")
|
|
Arikado
New Blood
I, too, have things I must do within these castle walls.
Posts: 80
inherit
995
0
Dec 11, 2019 9:55:47 GMT -6
65
Arikado
I, too, have things I must do within these castle walls.
80
Dec 30, 2015 2:16:15 GMT -6
December 2015
arikado
|
Post by Arikado on May 26, 2019 14:36:48 GMT -6
- You go to the chicken product in its freezer etc, take it to the cashier and explain "I should be able to take this product home for free and enjoy it whenever at my leisure in my home, because I have already paid for the enjoyment of it since you have it to eat freely here"
I don't agree with the analogy here, as it's different from what I'm saying completely. Listening to the OST of a game you own is like buying a picture book and looking up clean images of the book's pictures online. You can easily take a picture of your picture book with your phone's camera and edit the text out, or if you have a printer, you can print the pictures yourself, but you simply chose to save a bit of time by looking up clean images of your picture book that have the text edited out. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Likewise, you can easily record the soundtracks of the game you own and listen to them, but you chose to save a bit of time by looking them up online. It's the same thing. The company doesn't lose anything by me going online and listening to the soundtrack of their game (that I bought) instead of recording them myself and listening to them. No, I'm not saying people shouldn't buy the soundtracks separately, I'm saying it's not required. People should only buy the soundtracks of their games (or other media) if they feel like it, they shouldn't feel obliged to do that. As long as we're clear on that, we can move on. I was like you too about appreciating music quality until I upgraded my listening devices. A better pair of headphones (especially headphones in my experience) or speakers makes all the difference. I went from "I can tell a moderate difference in my $10 drug store headphones to these $50 Amazon ones" to "HOLY crap it's night and day with these $150+ ones/speakers") The fact that I don't have a $150 headset is exactly why I don't notice or care about lossless quality in music, and I imagine the majority of people are in the same boat. Mind you, I'm not completely against having a high quality headset, but right now, I'm just not interested. My phone's headphones do the job just fine.
|
|
purifyweirdshard
Administrator
Administrator
Calling from Heaven
Posts: 3,789
Staff Mini-Profile Theme: Example 2
inherit
Administrator
210
0
1
Oct 25, 2024 0:03:05 GMT -6
3,660
purifyweirdshard
Calling from Heaven
3,789
Jun 29, 2015 7:24:38 GMT -6
June 2015
purifyweirdsoul
Staff Mini-Profile Theme: Example 2
|
Post by purifyweirdshard on May 26, 2019 15:11:45 GMT -6
I can see what you mean there. I think that the potential difference to me here is the lower quality/technically "preview" versions of songs being on Youtube and x legal free streaming thing don't constitute full purchases of the songs, so that's kind of the grey area. It gets muddier when you go down the road of downloading using fileshare services.
My analogy addresses as much or more general content ownership perceptions I've seen over the years, so sorry I confused what you were conveying there. Related points were already in my mind from all the value vs support things spawned from the news.
|
|
Arikado
New Blood
I, too, have things I must do within these castle walls.
Posts: 80
inherit
995
0
Dec 11, 2019 9:55:47 GMT -6
65
Arikado
I, too, have things I must do within these castle walls.
80
Dec 30, 2015 2:16:15 GMT -6
December 2015
arikado
|
Post by Arikado on May 26, 2019 16:10:46 GMT -6
No worries. I do think listening to the soundtrack on youtube and downloading it (from youtube) is the same thing, as long as your reason for downloading it is to listen to it and nothing else.
You could always record the soundtrack from in-game with a capture device and save it on your phone, and you're legally allowed to do that, as long as you only save it to listen to it. It's the same thing.
|
|
purifyweirdshard
Administrator
Administrator
Calling from Heaven
Posts: 3,789
Staff Mini-Profile Theme: Example 2
inherit
Administrator
210
0
1
Oct 25, 2024 0:03:05 GMT -6
3,660
purifyweirdshard
Calling from Heaven
3,789
Jun 29, 2015 7:24:38 GMT -6
June 2015
purifyweirdsoul
Staff Mini-Profile Theme: Example 2
|
Post by purifyweirdshard on May 26, 2019 16:36:05 GMT -6
haha well now we're back to disagreeing because I don't think that's accurate (ripping the game music being closer to taking the chicken package out of the store in my example, where Youtube would be take-home free samples not quite as good as full product), but I wouldn't know where to start to prove my case unless I googled for a significant amount of time. All I meant for my point originally is that the OST digitally has value, at least to many, even if not all people.
|
|
kamuiarikado
Loyal Familiar
[TI0] Elitist Gatekeeper
Posts: 111
inherit
1956
0
May 8, 2020 8:13:04 GMT -6
102
kamuiarikado
[TI0] Elitist Gatekeeper
111
Aug 24, 2017 15:04:49 GMT -6
August 2017
kamuiarikado
|
Post by kamuiarikado on May 26, 2019 16:36:15 GMT -6
saberwolf94"You're basically saying what almost everyone has said that wants to defend 505 like they're your brother or something." I'm NOT defending and/or justifying 505 or Artplay actions, but my point is they didn't break any american law by making this decisions and last minute changes. Because you didn't read my complete post, here's a summary of my wall of text: "know 505 have committed a lot of mistakes, and the Mac/Linux situation was unfair, but that matter has already been addressed (and solved in a way) by the means of giving the affected the option to change the digital copy to physical (MAC/LINUX BACKERS ONLY), so they can sell it and get more money that they had been pledged, because of the exclusive physical swag." "I am a backer too, ($125 tier), and I was affected with the Vita port cancellation (I bought a Vita specifically to play Bloodstained: RotN), but I'm not shouting: SCAM! LAWSUIT! LIARS! I WILL PIRATE YOUR GAME! I WILL NEVER BACK A IGA/505 GAME AGAIN! and so on, at the slightest provocation like some of the backers affected by the Mac/Linux/Vita, the FuturePak steel case and the DLC situation." "Let me clear that I’m not defending 505 and/or ArtPlay actions, but I think some of the backers (fortunately, they are a very small vocal minority) are making a storm in a glass of water, and obviously I'm saying some of the backers, and not all of them, because there are well indented and reasonable arguments being said on the aforementioned platform, so this isn’t a call to censorship." TL;DR - The things as they are, What 505 was done was disappointing and unfair, but at least they are trying to solved this situation, and obviously I'm playing devil's advocate here. - 505/ArtPlay didn't break any american laws. - 505/ArtPlay aren't my brothers, nor my lovers, nor my husbandos, nor my gods, and I think marrying with a company is one for the stupidest things you can do. - It's OK to be angry, upset, disappointed or been cautiously excited for the game. - Obviously this is just my opinion and you can putting in the trash and burning with hellfire if you want, I really don't care at this point.
|
|
kamuiarikado
Loyal Familiar
[TI0] Elitist Gatekeeper
Posts: 111
inherit
1956
0
May 8, 2020 8:13:04 GMT -6
102
kamuiarikado
[TI0] Elitist Gatekeeper
111
Aug 24, 2017 15:04:49 GMT -6
August 2017
kamuiarikado
|
Post by kamuiarikado on May 26, 2019 17:07:58 GMT -6
Actually no. It is not legal to download a copyrighted work off Youtube. You can listen to licensed music on YT all you want, but you can't download it. (Well actually you can and nobody will sue you for it, but that's another can of worms. In theory, you're not supposed to do that.) Digital OSTs for video games are generally so cheap too. Services like Bandcamp also provides you with the download of any format you like (and trust me, the difference in quality IS noticeable), so when I really like an OST, I buy it on Bandcamp. Yeah, some bigger devs don't have a Bandcamp page or even a Spotify page to listen to the tunes but most indie composers do have them. Well, we're not supposed to lie, yet everyone does it. It's simply my belief that if I own a game, I should have the right to listen to its soundtracks, and what's the difference between listening and downloading the soundtrack? You download it to listen to it, so there's no difference in my book. I can start the game that I own and listen to its soundtracks anytime I want, but having the soundtrack on my phone is simply more convenient, nothing more and nothing less. As for quality, I have downloaded lossless soundtracks and I honestly never noticed any difference in quality that's worth mentioning. It's just not something that many people notice or care about. I think you have the right to rip your personal RotN game's OST copy, upload it to Dropbox, Google Drive, MEGA or any service you want, but for personal use only, not for sharing with other people on the Internet. The same with the Artbook, you can scan your personal copy and uploading it in one of the aforementioned services, or putting the music and artbook in your phone if you want. Is it right to doing that? That's a gray area, and probably the company don't like people doing that, but if you're ripping the OST and Artbook for your personal use, in my personal opinion I think you can do that because you aren't promoting piracy and/or hurting the company.
|
|
Arikado
New Blood
I, too, have things I must do within these castle walls.
Posts: 80
inherit
995
0
Dec 11, 2019 9:55:47 GMT -6
65
Arikado
I, too, have things I must do within these castle walls.
80
Dec 30, 2015 2:16:15 GMT -6
December 2015
arikado
|
Post by Arikado on May 26, 2019 17:41:34 GMT -6
kamuiarikado Yes, this is what I'm trying to convey to purifyweirdshard; you bought the game, so you have the right to use anything within the game for your personal use, including the soundtracks.
|
|